The United States of America as a Communist Regime

Please note:  I am by education a political scientist with a Ph.D in political science / political philosophy. What I write I do not do only as a citizen of the United States of America, but as a student of political philosophy. One of my areas of specialization was in Gnostic-totalitarian mass movements, including the Puritans, Marxists, Soviets, National Socialists, Communist Chinese, Islamic fundamentalists, other terrorist groups, and so on.  

At the outset, let’s ask a few questions: How long will it be before Washington, D.C, undergoes a name change, on the grounds that President George Washington owned slaves? How long will it be before our country undergoes a name change, because “America” was supposedly founded as a product of “colonialism” and “racism”?  I wonder what name the rulers in the capital city will seek to impose on us?  More fundamentally, who or what is leading the movement of our country into a totally different kind of political system—into a Communist empire? Who are the leaders behind the scenes?  I think that one is former President Obama, who clearly is a Marxist, and whose practices as President were decidedly influenced by totalitarian regimes that seek complete one-party control. When Obama claimed that “we will transform the world,” I knew that he had imbibed Marxist ideology, probably at Columbia and at Harvard. That the world is what it is, and cannot be “transformed” by human action, is the kind of common sense reality from which Obama and other Marxists in this country are oblivious. But who the other main leaders are, I do not know. I truly doubt that one is President Biden, who clearly has difficulty functioning mentally. Speaker Pelosi is a practical leader, but she takes her marching orders from elsewhere. From whom? What clever, devious minds are pushing their extreme agenda? Where are their more bizarre ideas coming from? I return to this issue when I point to the primary model for our nascent totalitarian Communist regime in our nation’s capital.  

What has happened to us, what is happening now?  Admittedly, the pace of our slide into a totalitarian Communist regime has been sped up significantly by one-party domination in the Federal government—Presidency, House of Representatives, Senate, much of the federal judiciary, and the Federal bureaucracy. And the “Democratic Party” is led and motivated not by the “liberal Democrats” of recent decades who fought hard to protect the First Amendment rights for all citizens. This self-styled “progressive movement” seeks to abolish freedom of speech for anyone who clearly voices opinions contrary to theirs. When a Communist regime comes to power—as in the countries of Eastern Europe where the Soviet Union imposed Communist regimes on Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, and Bulgaria after the Second World War, the new Communist-inspired and led government immediately takes control of all mass media. In those days, the press and radio, and soon television were immediately taken over. They also immediately began imprisoning dissenters from their rule, claiming that they need to be “re-educated,” that is, indoctrinated as Marxist- Communists.  

The American slide into a Communist regime (not at all “democratic Socialism” as is loudly proclaimed) is not as recent as many would think. Already in the 1920’s and 1930’s, the American Left included many intellectual who were pro-Soviet, because they were pro-Communist. Many of our American thought leaders in the mid-20th century were Marxists or at last under heavy Marxist influence. This continued unabated, as far as I can tell, until the early 1950’s in the anti-Communist activities of Senator McCarthy and others of his stripe. They knew much was wrong in academia and Hollywood, and especially in the American Federal government, but resisted it quite ineffectually. By the 1960’s, Marxism was loudly proclaimed as the “wave of the future” on American college campuses. When I began at the University of Washington in 1969, the student hostel / dormitory I investigated joining had a large dining hall with two enormous portraits at either end: one of Karl Marx, and one of Vladimir Lenin. It was a Communist cell for all practical purposes. A number of professors promoted Communism, or at the very least, “democratic Marxism.” Campus radicals rioted, bludgeoned at least one professor, forced the closing of classes, and so on. At this stage, the outspoken Communists were students and student leaders, and not often the professors. Gradually, no few of these Communist youths became professors, and American academy has become increasingly under the spell of Communist ideology. It moved down into secondary and even primary education. America is deemed an “evil empire” or “evil regime,” “founded on slavery,” and it must be “transformed” into a totalitarian political system ruled by “experts” and “scientists” who “have knowledge” of the future—for example, that if governments of the world do not act together in a very large (i.e., enormously expensive) fashion, the world will “be destroyed by climate change.” This belief, so prominently forced into the minds of our young, is used to amass unrivaled political power in the hands of the ruling class.  It has worked very effectively, because so many people are gullible—especially our young, most subject to their brain-washing.

What are the distinctive characteristics of a Communist regime?  First, while loudly claiming to be “democratic,” as in “the People’s Republic of China,” or in the Constitution of the former Soviet Union, in fact a Communist system is ruled by one Party, one elite, which has a monopoly of power over virtually everything in the political society.  It seeks to impose its thoughts, its beliefs, on everyone. No rival opinions are allowed to succeed. If someone is a threat to their ideological domination, that voice is silenced by in effect “pulling the plug” on all access to mass media—mainly television and especially “social media” of FaceBook, Google, Twitter, and so on.  A Communist regime will not tolerate views contrary to the Party line. Public shunning, “politically correct” speech, and now “canceling” have become a way of life in America in recent years—first on university campuses, now from Washington DC and the manipulators of social and mass media. Because President Trump threatened their monopoly of power, their will to dominate the lives of all Americans in every conceivable way, he has been denied mass media access with surprising effectiveness. One Party rule, one “party line,” gets enforced on everyone—whether they want it or not. What the individual citizen wants and needs is irrelevant; what matters is “the Party,” which forces “unity” on all and pretends to speak on behalf of all.

Second, the foremost goal of a Communist regime is precisely what we have seen taking place in our nation’s capital: the Party seeks to gain power at all costs (“whatever it takes,” as these elitists say), to keep its power tightly held, and to destroy any forces that would threaten its monopoly of power. Their will is to dominate, not only human bodies, but minds as well.  They seek complete control over all aspects of life in our political society, and around the world, to the extent possible.  The regime most like what these political leaders and elites seek to be is Communist China. China is the present model for what we are becoming, because our elites envy the way their regime controls all aspects of citizens’ lives. Our rulers do not look back to the Soviet Union so much, nor to National Socialist Germany (which was also totalitarian), but to Red China. That should be clear to every close observer of our leaders. What does China have that our leaders want? Complete power and domination over its citizens. How does China do it? They control the mass media, social media, punish dissenting voices, dominate the economy, and the Party decides who advances to leadership in the country, and who does not. And this is precisely what we see developing in the USA.  

Third, what is likely to happen before our eyes now? The Party leaders in Washington, aided by Federal bureaucrats and judges, will seek to abolish state and local control over elections, over leadership, over significant decision-making. The Party with its power based at the national level will dictate more and more what is permitted as free speech, what is permitted in state elections, in the everyday lives of citizens, in the ownership of handguns, in allowing vast numbers of illegal migrants to enter our country and to be given a vote to help ensure one-Party domination. Whatever increases government power under the Party will be considered “good,” and whatever weakens or threatens virtual absolute control from Washington will be “counter-revolutionary,” or “reactionary,” or in the favored labels of the day, “racist” and “white supremacist." Communists, as typical Gnostics, always have enemies they must destroy, and they see their chosen “evil” in anyone who questions or threatens what they do. These elites in our country—who are mainly white themselves—do not show genuine concern for minorities at all. They squash minority voices, and seek to establish a “tyranny of the majority,” using de Tocqueville’s famous term for what happens in “democracies.”  Our totalitarian rulers are threatened by truth.

Fourth, I have observed several domestic workshops and then models of their domination in our culture. The main workshop for developing their ideology is the university, where they seek to eliminate any voices that challenge or threaten their party line, their Marxist-globalist ideology. The second model of domination is the abortion clinic, where utterly helpless human beings are treated as garbage to be thrown out. There we see workshops for perfecting techniques and hardening minds to mass murder, and models, plans, for what awaits those who do not “accept the party line,” who stand back and not simply accept their Party domination. The “Progressives” in America seek total domination of all aspects of our lives.  Be prepared. For they now have enormous political power.  

          —6 March 2021

​28 Sept 2020

I hear in the news absurdly false claims: that it is not “legitimate” for Trump to nominate someone now to the Supreme Court.

Note: win or lose in the November election, and presuming he remains alive for a few more months, D J Trump remains our President at least until 20 January 2021—win or lose the election, he holds the office and all of its powers, prerogatives, and duties under law at least until 20 January 2021, and longer if he wins the election.  

That no few members of the Supreme Court were nominated and place on the Court right at the end of a President’s term seems to escape folks in the media and other partisans.

Consider just one case. In November 1800, V-P Thomas Jefferson defeated then President John Adams for President.  Adams was a Federalist; Jefferson the founder of the “Republican Party” (which became the “Democratic-Republican party,” and then the “Democratic Party,” as it is known today.  

Adams was defeated, but his coup promoted Federalist interests for about 35 years. Just before leaving office, Adams appointed his Secretary of State, John Marshall, to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. That appointment was made on 20 Jan 1801, and Marshall was confirmed and began serving as Chief Justice a week later, 27 Jan 1801.  He remained Secretary of State as well, until Adams’ term as President ended, and Jefferson was inaugurated as our 3rd President on March 4, 1801.  

So Marshall was nominated for Chief Justice and confirmed under a defeated President, at the end of his term. Never read that Jefferson claimed it was “illegitimate,” because Adams remained President until the day Jefferson was inaugurated.  

The consequences were enormous for our history. Chief Justice Marshall wrote the opinion for Marbury v Madison in Feb 1803. In that decision, Marshall did what was NOT explicit in the Constitution:  he used the Supreme Court to declare an act of Congress illegal under the Constitution. There is no such power given to the Supreme Court in the Constitution; this was a major political coup in our history:  the Supreme Court made itself supreme over acts of Congress.  

Such is the legacy of Adams post-defeat appointment of John Marshall as Chief Justice.  I think that he served about 35 years—the longest serving Chief Justice in our history, and probably the most consequential. He was succeeded in that office by Roger Tawney of Maryland, who wrote the dreadful Dred Scott decision of 1857—the case that drew Lincoln back into politics: blacks can be property, but they are not and cannot be “persons” under the law. Quoting Lincoln’s great Second Inaugural of 1865, “And the war came.”  

14 Sept 2020

Ours has been described as “an age of anxiety” (first used just after WWII, I believe).  Many feel it, many express it in various ways: A sense of upheaval, unsettling change, loss, unhappiness, anxiety, depression, despair, rage, forebodings of doom, “future shock,” and so on.

One finds similar states in the Hellenistic age in the west, c 300 BC to about 400 AD. Literature such as the “Book of Revelation” included with misgivings at the end of the New Testament is a classic text of emotional-spiritual mess, and yet also has tales of hope and fulfillment. In the middle ages, these overwhelming social anxieties settled down, but increased in about the 1400’s into the present. If one reads Luther, for example (1483-1546), one clearly sees the emotional-spiritual-intellectual upheaval of an age; one sees it in the Puritan revolution of the 1600’s, in the French Enlightenment thinkers and then the eruption of the French Revolution at the end of the 1700’s. We all know that our society is rife with anxious tensions, unhappiness, etc, affecting individuals and groups to varying degrees.

One thing that abides in my mind as I reflect on Homer (8th century BC): although there is violence and evils operate in his world (mainly unregulated human passions), the actors are generally more peaceful, settled, with feet on the ground. An exception is Akhilleus, filled with wrath—the issue that is central to the Iliad. He upsets the balance in the human condition—acts outside the bounds, as embodied most in his treatment of his opponent, Hektor. Odysseus, on the other hand, is not wrathful, restless, or irrational, but “resourceful,” clever, up to any challenge fate throws at him; he lives within the ordered boundaries. Homer’s world was orderly and settled, but not dead or static. Hence, I would say that reading Homer is like entering a realm of youthful spirit, buoyancy, modest hopes for better things to come—not fatalistic pessimism, nor naive utopian dreaming. The cosmos is stable, a friendly home—a good home to those who obey its laws and limits.  

This is astounding to me: within about 250-300 years of Homer, the Greek-speaking world undergoes a major outbreak in the discovery of reason—first philosophy, then science (and the tragedians and historians). The human being is capable of using intellect and making sound choices, achieving much good; or having “twisted reasoning” (Cicero’s term) and making bad choices, and doing great harm to himself and others. Human being emerges as the locus of rational discourse, reason, good—not on Olympos, but within the human psyche. In reading Plato and Aristotle, one sees how much the human mind, governed by reason, is capable of achieving. It truly is an astounding development and a cultural high point in human history—to which we remain beneficiaries. Looking back, I see the potential as present in Homer and his world—perhaps especially in the importance of right action within the bounds set by the gods, or what we might call “nature” (Greek:  physis).  In reading the earliest recorded philosophers—such as Parmenides (born c 515 BC), one sees reason emerging from myth, story, and becoming a tool for discovering the nature of reality (Parmenides’ main discovery: being, Is!, the grounding insight of philosophy; he also discovered and named “nous,” intellect, as the divine power operative in human being to know what is).  

Ah, the youthful, life-affirming, life-giving world of the ancient Greeks.  Such a flourishing of what Hegel calls “Spirit” (Geist) in humankind—making possible what we call “history,” the realm of human being (Hegel, “the realm of the Geist’s unfolding”).  Homer may be called a “mytho-poet,” but looking back from the philosophy that soon emerges among Greek speakers, I see the potential for such a magnificent life of the mind as philosophy and science essentially are. Homer embodies the fertile soil from which the plant of rational thought will grow; Homer’s world is rich with possibilities, as is youth; and some of these possibilities grow within several centuries of astounding breakthroughs.  

If there is a practical lesson here, it would seem to be this: Avoid yielding to anxieties, fears, restless passions, and develop and maintain a youthful spirit, open to possibilities.  

Just a few reflections as I keep reading Homer.  

WPM

N4^,

About the target for our truly revolutionary act, I have learned nothing yet. I know only that our Leaders—those further up the Ladder of Equality—are planning the spectacle of spectacles to bring down this country as we have pulled down its idol-statues. One of their cities will be obliterated. And you are right—how easily the whole old regime is crumbling.  It was as empty as their false consciousness.  

But that is a little further off. We have something now to accomplish. You are typically prescient in your note about pulling down the wicked Christian symbols. I have reason to believe that our Leaders are preparing to take over one of the very sizable churches in, I believe, New York, DC, or LA.  And from what I’ve heard, its very soon. Our actions will shock and shake those addicted to their god. We will give them some more “martyrs.”  

You are right, Comrade. These idiots offer nearly no resistance. The Revolution was won years ago through our re-education of their young people. We’ve prepared the soil for the Revolution, and prepared it well. We stripped them from their roots, their rotten roots, and virtually not a cry went up. Such easy targets, these Americans were.

We are preparing to make the 2020 election so chaotic that some of their factions will break out in violence. They are again playing right into our hands. There will be no “winner.” We are bringing this regime to a speedy end. Out of the superficial political squabbles, more violence will result to give us opportunities. The more these old party boys and girls fight, the stronger we become. They are clutching to the illusions of power. They themselves have helped the Revolution immensely, without knowing it. So short-sighted these “politicians” are. They are models of false consciousness, as you know. False indeed, and so useful for us.

D3*

My Dear Comrade,

I must confess to you that I am somewhat surprised at how quickly this country has fallen. Although I have known the surety of our triumph, I did expect some resistance to our iconoclastic spree. I thought some politicians, police officers, or even a few old codgers who had fought for this decadent country's false values would show up and try to stop us. Nothing like this has happened. We have chosen the opportune time when "the greatest generation" has all died or has locked themselves up in fear of the virus. Soon, that generation will be forgotten and our generation, the harbingers of the revolution, will become the greatest that this country has seen. It will be us who will finally set this country free of the tyranny of the white man and all he stood for. 
 
Everywhere you look, our victory is being made manifest. Statues of this country's founders are being pulled down and defiled. Any man who dared to think himself better than his peers is being humbled by us. What we have begun with statues, we will continue with mountains. Those sneering presidents in South Dakota won't look so smug once we acquire an adequate amount of dynamite. After the presidents and generals, our task is to take out the Christian images. Windows, paintings, and statues that show their Jesus and his companions as peaceful white folks must be dealt with. Any artwork made by the white people of privilege will find its place as fuel for our fires. What was once beautiful must disappear if we wish to complete our transformation of man. History will be re-written according to our image. What remains of the white man's culture will be crushed. Soon, all they will know about who they were as a people is what we tell them to know. There will be nothing human that remains in this race. There will be no trace of greatness left among them. Any deviant from our creed, any person who dares to think themselves above us, will be brought down. It is our destiny to reduce all to rubble and leave nothing but the void in place. Once they experience this void, they will come to us for we will consume their souls and fill it with the fire of our lust. 

The age of the old man has ended. We are here to usher in the dawn of the new man. We will not stop until our goal has been achieved. Let those who cannot be transformed be destroyed.  

Humbly Yours,
N4^

A brief note on Ingmar Bergman’s film, “Winter Light” (1962, in Swedish).

I have come across several claims online and in a video commentary on DVD that Ingmar Bergman considered the film titled “Winter Light” in English to be his best film.  Quite a claim for one of the foremost directors of film. "I think I have made just one picture that I really like, and that is `Winter Light.'  Everything is exactly as I wanted to have it, in every second of this picture."  Ingmar Bergman.  (Note again: the film has the double entendre title in Swedish, “The Communicants,” which gets more at the inner meaning than the external, visual  title in English, “Winter Light,” although both are suitable.) In the film, there is no communion with God, or with nature, and minimal communion between human beings. That is why the Swedish title is paradoxically fitting:  “Communicants.”  

I’ve been re-watching scenes from the film last night and again this morning, and I did some reading online. The movie is often ranked among the best ever made. Watching it, I do not feel a need to watch other Bergman films right now, not even three that I saw years ago, and which burned into my memory:  “The Seventh Seal,” “Autumn Sonata” (perhaps actress Ingrid Bergman’s last film), and “Fanny and Alexander.” Others of his movies did not speak to me as much.  

One could dismiss these films as “neurotic,” or “atheistic,” or “existentialist,” but I think that they capture much of the spirit of 20th century western world. There’s no pretense in “Winter Light,” no place to hide behind “faith” or “love.” It is starkly painful. Björnstrand’s performance, aided outwardly by his suffering at the time from bronchitis, is superb. He is an utter spiritual and emotional wasteland. I noticed that some reviewer complained that he could not relate to the character played by Björnstrand at all; I suspect the writer was a little superficial, and did not want to see the void within himself, or other, or in our “modern world” generally.  Yes, it is painful, but realistic. No doubt the film portrays Ingmar Bergman himself, and it is his portrait of his father, too—a Lutheran pastor. Bergman’s existential void is common in the generation after Nietzsche (Bergman was born in 1918, died in 2007—so born just 17 years after Nietzsche’s death). But this spiritual void was alive and active in Europe already by the 15th century. It is “modernity” displayed for the viewer in utterly stark, black-and-white, no-thrill images, photographed (as I wrote recently) by the unsurpassed Sven Nyqvist ("new twig"). My father would have been awed by the photography if he had seen the film. It is not “spectacular scenery” at all, but piercingly stark black and white that leave the viewer no place to hide from what is displayed. This is typified or heightened in a 6-minute vignette in which nothing but the leading lady’s face is shown as she recites the letter she wrote to her pastor-lover. There is nothing to see but her face as she reveals his utter self-absorption and lovelessness.  I think that many Americans would not want to see such a mirror on screen.  It is a mirror of our own inner void.  

The last scene / final visual shot of the film could not have been more perfect. In a virtually empty church, one sees nothing but the pastor who opens the Lutheran service with the Swedish for:  “Holy, holy, holy is the LORD God. Heaven and earth are full of his glory.”  No moving shots, the pastor is viewed from a low angle, pinned against an image of the crucified. His tone is flat and dead, like his soul. Then immediately the film ends.  

I think that the movie is more than most viewers want to bear. A lady I spoke to after our home Mass last evening said that she finds Bergman too “heavy,” and wants lighter films. Forgive my comment, but I would say, “And that is typically American, the desire to hide from stark reality.” Not many here stomach Nietzsche or Kafka. Far more appealing to Americans would be “The Sound of Music” (which I also enjoyed). We do not like seeing the wasteland that we as a people in history have become.

As I write I hear nothing but the ticking of my grand-father clock near me. And that is all one hears in a scene from “Winter Light:” The loud ticking of an old clock, and Pastor Eriksson’s starkly empty expression.

—21 June 2020

Comrade, 

I see you have picked up on my religious inclination. Yes, it is true, I have studied the religious impulse of man as a youth. Sun Tzu says, know your enemies. Their collective belief in their god has been a powerful force throughout history. I like powerful forces. My studies have been very useful in our cause. The religious impulse of man is something that he cannot escape. Man needs a cause higher than himself to believe in, to worship, and to follow. Man needs the camaraderie of other human beings participating in that same end. Man needs public worship. We have taken these lessons and applied them to our cause. We have given man something more to believe in than himself. We have established a practice of worship including the act of public sacrifice. We have even established an Inquisition against false believers (a nice touch, if I say so myself). Yes, our cause is the new religion of the masses. One of the enemy sages has said that once man ceases to believe in God, it is not that he won't believe in anything. Instead, he will believe in everything. How easy it has been for us to make man believe once we've stripped him of his false religion.

The second point I wanted to address to you is to wonder why you spend so much of your focus on the fool Trump. Yes, he may have been a formidable foe in the beginning but through our constant efforts over the last four years, we have bound him by his sins. Instead of allowing him to unite the enemy against us, we, through the help of the media, have used him to further divide this wretched country into the chaos that has ensued. Our people have failed to cooperate with any of the visions he held for a greater America and we have emphasized every little blunder he has made to the point where he is rendered incompetent by his enemies and many of those who formerly supported him. Should he return after the next election (assuming there is an election), we can use his position to our advantage and further wreck havoc through the popular hatred of the man. Should the other guy get in, he will be as good a pawn for us as we could hope for. Our people are already working on selecting a VP for him who will be a true mastermind for our cause as Comrade Obama was. The revolution will advance regardless of who holds that office.

In the meantime, we have more cause to celebrate. Their hero on the Supreme Court has sided with us in redefining sex to our purpose. Just watch and see what we are able to do with this court decision. It should be quite fun. Soon, there will be no place left for the enemies to hide.

Waiting in ecstacy,
N4^

June 15, 2020

Comarade N4^,

You are able to see through Christian BS very well. (Maybe you imbibed before you got woke!) And you are right how we have infiltrated their superstitious and meaningless Christian movement and churches and emasculated many of them. We stripped them of their God, their church, their bible, and most of them do not even know it. Work imaginatively and creatively done by others in our movement over the years. Of course we agree with our friend Marx:  “In a word, I hate all the gods.”  I remind myself of these words Marx included at the front of his doctoral dissertation nearly every day. The critique of politics and society must begin with the critique of religion. And that critique can be summarized as Nietzsche wrote:  “God is dead. He remains dead. And we have killed him.” No one has made their god as pathetically meaningless as Christians. What an insipid, bloodless god they have. Doesn’t strike back because he’s powerless! Indeed, a non-entity.  

You are right, too, that the more courageous followers of their Jesus-god are in the rural areas of their country.  And as you said, they are politically powerless—although they can be gutsy. We can handle them as we gain all power. They will be squashed as insects.  They will not endure what is in store for them. Too bad, but it’s for the greater cause of justice and Socialism for all!

I have some good news to share, if you have not already read it. Some high-ranking military officers have called for a coup against that slob President Trump. Comrade, this is very good news!  Revolution, man!  Just what we want. Then candidate Biden joined in, and openly declared that “Trump will try to steal the election.” If he “wins,” or claims to win, Biden (such an easy tool for us) has already said that he will call on the military to take Trump out of the White House! This is good news for the Cause, because it virtually guarantees a civil war. And we know who stands to gain as these petty politicos go at each other. “We cannot let a good crisis go to waste.” And we won’t. We will “capitalize” on turmoil—the best kind of capitalism! As the bourgeois parties fight each other, we will take power. We already have plenty of sympathizers on the hard left of the so-called “Democratic Party.” (Democracy, hell! They are used to ruling cities with iron fists, just as we would do!) We need to foment as much turmoil and hatred in this country as possible. It is necessary for the triumph of State Socialism—or what these idiots like to call “Communism.”  We will triumph the more as they seek to destroy each other,  

I know that some of our leaders have regular communication with the Party in China. They are proud of our work, and will continue to fund us. But they urge us to keep the pressure on, because they can see this country coming apart at the seams. As Chairman Mao wrote, “America is a paper tiger.” The paper tiger is ripping apart—with our help. Or maybe we are setting it on fire!  It is good to know that any genuine assistance we need will be provided by our fellow travelers elsewhere. And we have some Big Boys on Wall Street who fund us willingly (they even put loot into “Occupy Wall Street!” A clever ruse!)  I know that first hand, because I worked with one of them some years ago. He’s about as wicked as I am, but more fiendishly clever. He’s great. We can count on him, but the old man is heading for the grave. Too bad, but such is life—a one-way ticket to nothingness. Nothing matters but the Party and the Cause for which we give all.

You may have heard that we are planning a major assault in one of the enemies’ big cities. This one will be especially bloody, because when some of our comrades shed their blood for our Cause, then more become committed and willing to die to bring in the New Age under a Socialist State. “We will overcome.” But there must be more bloodshed to stir up fervor in us, and fear in their disgusting bourgeois hearts. We will cower them by playing on their fear of death—these gutless wonders.

Keep up your good work, and let me know if you are successful in infiltrating some of the enemies’ strongholds. You can be very slippery, Comrade!  We like that!

Victory will be ours.

D3*